June 18, 2001
First of all I would like to say that I respect
your opinion as should anyone.
Based on your 5th paragraph in your article and
most likely the rest I would like to say this and I truly believe it is not
rationalizing. Though you will have to let me know your
opinon.
What none believers have to realize is this bible
was written 5,000 to aproximatly 1,500 years ago were at the time women were not
even considered second class citizens. But to trade for land and to
produce sons to work and gather more land by marring of women whos family had
some weath (dowry).
If at the the time women were given an equal roll
all would have been dismissed and God would not have been able to send his son
for the furgivness of our sins past, preasant and future. ( which fulfilled
several proficies evidanced in Roman as well as Jewish history
text). What people today fail todo when discussing politicaly
correct ( or incorrect ) passages in the bible is transport themselves back
to the mindset of the people at the time it was written. If
it had've been written in modern day english and understanding do you
really think that the uneducated or even the educated people of that time would
have understood.
Secondly on churches
condeming homosexuality, I implore them to look at themselves first
before they judge others. Wheather Homosexuals like it or not that
lifestyle is a sin to God. But he still loves them as he would an
adulterer or a sixty year old women gausiping in the church. God sees
anything that Jesus would not do as a sin, not the pearson as
sin.
Again to any church leader that may read this the
only reason to cast anyone out of a church is if they are braging or bosting and
drawing other people to the sin they are bosting about. Upon asking for
forgivness in Jesus's name they should be allowed back into church.
Lyle Heller
ps feel free to post my name and
address